GSL Blog

Back to Blog Homepage »

Author Archive

IT Projects: The Human Element

Monday, September 26th, 2011

Information technology projects are essentially business process re-engineering projects.  Too many decision-makers expect that:

1.       The business problem is an automation problem.

2.       The automation solution will completely replace the manual process

Usually, neither case is completely true.  Sometimes not even remotely true.

If you think of an IT system as another employee, one with very specific talents, limitations and costs, you might set better expectations for your IT projects and realize better return on the investments.  For example, certain people are not good with customers, so you wouldn’t put them in a difficult customer service position, because they would ruin your customer relations.  When you do find a person who is qualified, you still make adjustments to their role based on their strengths.  The same is true when automating.

For example, you want to automate the import of invoices.  Currently, field salespeople maintain Excel workbooks, which they email to your accounting department for manual data entry.  You are, in effect, replacing the person who does the manual entry.  Don’t make the mistake that that person is just transferring data from one place to another.  The REAL business process demands that the employee make many decisions during data entry. Over time, their position has become the vital – albeit informal - quality control point for order processing.  That can be the very hardest automation to accomplish well.  It will demand that either the import process can replicate the smart data entry person OR that the data coming into the process becomes more formalized with validation and error-checking done in the field.

The point is, if you try to take the human completely out of the process, it will most likely fail and negatively affect your whole company.  Instead, focus on using automation to increase the efficiency of the data entry person’s process.  Expect to import 60% or so of the Excel data and send the rest as exceptions to the human for real attention.

This approach helps in many ways:

1.       Staff and project expectations and goals are attainable

2.       The project can be implemented more quickly because the more relaxed requirements allow the automation to be added to, instead of replacing, the current process.

3.       The automation process can be improved and updated without disrupting the whole process.

4.       As new things come up, new products, new business lines, new salespeople, etc., the process will be resilient, allowing the human to catch the new issues without creating a log jam.

Share/Save/Bookmark

You wouldn’t ask your carpenter to design your house, would you?

Friday, May 1st, 2009

Remember your friend ‘Bob’, the guy who spent all his time in the high school auto repair class learning how to take apart and rebuild auto engines? You wouldn’t have him design a new car for you, but if your ride was sputtering he might be your first call. Bob learned how to use a specific set of tools and, using those tools, he was really good.

Even though Bob knows car tools very well, he doesn’t know woodworking tools, or plumbing tools or drafting tools. To you and I, all of the tools may look baffling and similar, but they aren’t.

Information Technology is the same, just not as grimy. (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Silos and Interfaces

Friday, April 3rd, 2009

We live in an age in which not having data can be very costly.

It costs money to create and store data. The potential value of that data can only be realized if it can then be used by the right people and systems at the right time.

What is the cost of not having data when needed? It’s difficult to determine a dollar value, but sometimes it can be frighteningly expensive. Bonds traded at the wrong time, allergies not known before medication administered, product not available to ship to your largest customer…
typically only the most obvious data gaps are easily identified and dealt with. Systems like purchasing connected to inventory, or budgeting connected to financials. Many, many, many other data transfers are accomplished daily, but they are often manual, infrequent or one-time. Take your bank account for example: is it automatically connected to your bookkeeping system? Or do you create a download from the bank that you then import into your system? Or do you just manually update? (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Sometimes the solution is more complex than the problem

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009

Software solutions should reduce the complexity that we are “exposed to.” When it all boils down, that is the expectation; that is the sales pitch; it is the input to the ROT (Return-On-Investment) calculation. They should hide the complexity and repetition from your staff, increasing efficiency and accuracy.

Often, initially, that is what it looks like. As things progress though, the underlying complexity is often revealed again causing all sorts of problems that kill the value of the project. Sometimes these issues can even imperil an organization’s ability to function, because what was a ‘difficult process’ has now become impossible. (more…)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Technology

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

 

Technology is both a curse and a blessing, much like the weather. Unlike the weather, we have choices about how we use technology. In our personal lives bad technology decisions are usually pretty innocuous, resulting in some frustration and wasted time. In our businesses, bad decisions can spell doom.
So, how should we approach technology decisions?
I will be discussing this and many other topics regarding businesses, software and society in the coming months.
Stay tuned…. Tobey

Share/Save/Bookmark